Battle of Plassey, 1757
1757 · Plassey
Language Movement, 1952
1952 · Language
Liberation War, 1971
1971 · Liberation
Partition of Bengal and Swadeshi movement, 1905
1905 · Partition
❦

Discover Bengal · Unfolded

❦

Abdul Kahar Akond

✦

Retired police officer and Pilkhana investigation officer

CID investigation officer who led the 2009 Pilkhana case investigation and filed charges against 824 accused.

Est. 1947 · Bengal✺A Bilingual Archive

Biography

✦

Context

Abdul Kahar Akond

In the context of His work belongs to the post-incident prosecution and accountability process following the 25–26 February 2009 revolt at Bangladesh Rifles headquarters. Court records describe the evidence-gathering and witness-recording process, while rights reporting raised separate concerns about torture and the fairness of proceedings against some accused personnel., Abdul Kahar Akond is recognized as Retired police officer and Pilkhana investigation officer. CID investigation officer who led the 2009 Pilkhana case investigation and filed charges against 824 accused.

Contribution

As a Criminal Investigation Department officer, Abdul Kahar Akond led the investigation into the 2009 Pilkhana mutiny and massacre and submitted a charge sheet against 824 accused in the murder case.

Impact

Akond's investigation became part of the evidentiary foundation for the Pilkhana trials and a continuing public debate about accountability. A 2013 trial-court judgment also ordered departmental action against him over allegations that his investigation had been biased in relation to one accused; those allegations should be distinguished from the court record of his investigative role.

pilkhanabdr-mutiny2009investigation

Timeline Placement

✦

Abdul Kahar Akond appears in 1 linked timeline events, spanning 2009.

First Appearance

2009

Latest Appearance

2009

Active Span

2009

Linked Events

1

Legacy Summary

✦

Akond's investigation became part of the evidentiary foundation for the Pilkhana trials and a continuing public debate about accountability. A 2013 trial-court judgment also ordered departmental action against him over allegations that his investigation had been biased in relation to one accused; those allegations should be distinguished from the court record of his investigative role. This influence is reflected across 1 connected events.