Battle of Plassey, 1757
1757 · Plassey
Language Movement, 1952
1952 · Language
Liberation War, 1971
1971 · Liberation
Partition of Bengal and Swadeshi movement, 1905
1905 · Partition
❦

Discover Bengal · Unfolded

❦

1757 Figures

✦

Battle of Plassey

Full list of figures, martyrs, coordinators, and collectives associated with 1757.

Est. 1947 · Bengal✺A Bilingual Archive

Full Figure List

✦

22 profiles

Siraj ud-Daulah

LeaderPerson

Nawab of Bengal

“The last independent Nawab of Bengal before Plassey shifted political power toward the East India Company.”

As Nawab of Bengal, Siraj ud-Daulah challenged East India Company encroachment, captured Calcutta in 1756, and commanded Bengal’s forces at Plassey in 1757.

His short reign unfolded amid disputes over fortification, trade privileges, court succession, and sovereignty between the Bengal Subah and the Company.

His defeat at Plassey became a major turning point in the transfer of political influence from Bengal’s court to the East India Company.

plasseybengalanti-colonial
Details→

Robert Clive

LeaderPerson

East India Company Commander

“The Company commander whose victory at Plassey accelerated British political power in Bengal.”

As an East India Company commander, he led Company forces at Plassey and used alliances with Bengal’s court factions to expand British influence.

His Bengal career centered on the 1757 Battle of Plassey, the Company’s acquisition of revenue rights after 1765, and the military-political expansion that followed.

Clive’s victory at Plassey and subsequent political settlements helped shift Bengal from a regional court contested by European companies toward Company-dominated rule.

plasseyeast-india-companycolonial-expansion
Details→

Mir Jafar

LeaderPerson

Commander and Later Nawab of Bengal

“The commander whose alliance with the Company reshaped Bengal’s political order after Plassey.”

A senior commander under Siraj ud-Daulah, Mir Jafar joined the anti-Siraj coalition and was installed as Nawab after the Battle of Plassey.

His career reflects the overlap of Bengal court politics, military command, and East India Company intervention in 1756–1757.

His defection and appointment as Nawab were central to Plassey’s political outcome and the Company’s subsequent expansion of influence in Bengal.

plasseybengal-courtpower-shift
Details→

Miran

CoordinatorPerson

Military Actor in Mir Jafar Camp

“Miran, Mir Jafar's son, became a central military actor in Bengal's succession crisis after Plassey.”

As Mir Jafar's son and an active political-military figure, he played a role in consolidating post-Plassey authority.

Post-Plassey succession and coercive politics in Bengal.

His actions helped stabilize the new arrangement aligned with Company interests.

plasseysuccessionbengal-politics
Details→

Rai Durlabh Ram

CoordinatorPerson

Nawab's commander at Plassey

“Rai Durlabh Ram's non-commitment at Plassey was one of the elite alignments that weakened Siraj ud-Daulah's position.”

His non-commitment at Plassey weakened Siraj's position and shaped the battle's political outcome.

Military alignment crisis during the Battle of Plassey.

His stance reflected how elite defection shaped the battle's political outcome.

plasseymilitaryelite-realignment
Details→

Yar Latif Khan

CoordinatorPerson

Nawab's Military Commander

“Yar Latif Khan was one of the Nawab's principal commanders during the 1757 Battle of Plassey.”

He was among the principal commanders in Siraj ud-Daulah's army during Plassey.

Command structure of the Nawab's forces in 1757.

His role is part of the larger command breakdown that enabled Company victory.

plasseynawab-armycommand
Details→

Mohanlal

LeaderPerson

Key Officer Loyal to Siraj ud-Daulah

“Mohanlal was one of Siraj ud-Daulah's principal loyalist commanders during the Battle of Plassey.”

He remained one of the most active loyalists in Siraj's camp and continued fighting when others hesitated.

Plassey battlefield decisions and loyalist resistance.

He symbolizes the faction within the Nawab's camp that resisted capitulation.

plasseyloyalistmilitary-resistance
Details→

Mir Madan

MartyrPerson

Nawab's artillery commander at Plassey

Mir Madan commanded artillery and fought for Nawab Siraj ud-Daulah at the Battle of Plassey on 23 June 1757.

He was one of the commanders who actively engaged the East India Company’s forces; his death during the battle weakened the Nawab’s effective resistance.

Remembered in accounts of Plassey as a loyal fighting commander, Mir Madan represents the military resistance that confronted the Company’s advance.

plasseyartillerymartyrdom
Details→

Khwaja Abdul Hadi Khan

CoordinatorPerson

Faujdar of Rajmahal

“Faujdar of Rajmahal connected to the political contest around Plassey.”

Khwaja Abdul Hadi Khan served as faujdar of Rajmahal and is identified in Bengal historical accounts as a regional authority connected with the Plassey-era power contest.

Regional military-administrative authority in Nawabi Bengal.

His inclusion reflects how district-level military administrators were tied to the wider crisis of 1757 and the reordering of authority in Bengal.

plasseyrajmahalnawabi-administration
Details→

Naba Singh Hazari

CoordinatorPerson

Military Officer in Nawab's Side

“Naba Singh Hazari represents the lesser-known Nawabi officers recorded in accounts of the 1757 Plassey conflict.”

Listed among military actors associated with the Plassey conflict in Bengali historical reference works.

Nawabi military alignments during 1757.

Represents the wider network of officers involved in the conflict beyond the most famous commanders.

plasseymilitary-networknawabi-bengal
Details→

Jagat Seth

OrganizationOrganization

Banking House and Court Financier

“The Murshidabad banking house whose court finance became part of the politics surrounding Plassey.”

The Jagat Seth banking house financed the Murshidabad court and became associated with the political coalition that opposed Siraj ud-Daulah around Plassey.

In eighteenth-century Bengal, banking, revenue flows, and court politics were closely connected. The house’s position shows how commercial finance entered negotiations over sovereignty in 1757.

Jagat Seth’s role helps explain the financial and elite alliances surrounding Plassey and the transfer of political influence toward the East India Company.

plasseyfinancemurshidabad
Details→

Umichand

CoordinatorPerson

Merchant-Broker

“Umichand was a Calcutta merchant-broker involved in the negotiations and intrigue before Plassey.”

A Calcutta-based merchant linked to negotiations and intrigue among Company officials and Bengal elites before Plassey.

Commercial mediation and political bargaining in 1757.

His case highlights the murky overlap of trade, diplomacy, and deception in the road to Plassey.

plasseymerchant-politicscalcutta
Details→

William Watts

CoordinatorPerson

Company Political Agent at Murshidabad

“William Watts was the Company's political intermediary at Murshidabad before the Battle of Plassey.”

He served as a principal Company intermediary in Murshidabad and helped manage contacts with anti-Siraj factions.

Company diplomacy and intelligence operations before Plassey.

His work was central to translating covert negotiations into strategic battlefield advantage.

plasseymurshidabadcompany-diplomacy
Details→

Luke Scrafton

CoordinatorPerson

Company Official and Political Associate

“Company political official associated with Bengal's Plassey-era operations.”

Luke Scrafton served in the East India Company's political operations in Bengal around the Plassey period.

Company administrative-political apparatus in mid-18th century Bengal.

His profile represents the officials who operationalized Company expansion through administration, diplomacy, and political intelligence beyond battlefield command.

plasseycompany-officialbengal-politics
Details→

Charles Watson

LeaderPerson

Royal Navy Admiral

“Royal Navy commander whose forces supported the British recovery of Calcutta before Plassey.”

Admiral Charles Watson commanded Royal Navy forces that supported East India Company operations in Bengal during the campaigns of 1756–1757.

His naval intervention followed the British loss of Calcutta and formed part of the combined military response against Siraj ud-Daulah. Naval power supported the recovery of Calcutta and the campaign that culminated at Plassey.

Watson's role shows how Royal Navy resources and Company political interests combined in the military transformation of Bengal before Plassey.

plassey-eranaval-powerbritish-intervention
Details→

Eyre Coote

CoordinatorPerson

Company Military Officer

“Company officer associated with Bengal's military campaigns after Plassey.”

Eyre Coote served as a Company military officer in Bengal during the campaigns surrounding Plassey and the subsequent consolidation of British power.

His career belongs to the late 1750s, when military operations, revenue interests, and political intervention combined to expand Company influence after the fall of Siraj ud-Daulah.

Coote's presence reflects the continuity between the military victory at Plassey and the later campaigns that converted Company influence into territorial and administrative power.

plassey-eracompany-armyconsolidation
Details→

Ghaseti Begum

CoordinatorPerson

Nawabi court power broker and anti-Siraj faction figure

“Influential Murshidabad court figure associated with anti-Siraj alignments before Plassey.”

Ghaseti Begum was a powerful figure in the Murshidabad court and was associated with factions opposed to Siraj ud-Daulah before the Battle of Plassey.

Her influence belonged to the succession and factional struggles within the Nawabi court before 1757. Court politics interacted with the ambitions of military commanders, bankers, and the East India Company.

Ghaseti Begum's position shows that Plassey's political preconditions were shaped by internal court conflict as well as British military intervention.

plasseycourt-politicsmurshidabad
Details→

Alivardi Khan

LeaderPerson

Former Nawab of Bengal

“Alivardi Khan's long rule shaped the succession politics inherited by Siraj ud-Daulah before Plassey.”

As Siraj ud-Daulah's predecessor and grandfather, his reign shaped the political order inherited during the Plassey crisis.

Nawabi Bengal before 1757.

His administrative and succession legacy framed the instability exploited during Plassey.

nawabi-bengalsuccessionplassey-context
Details→

Khwaja Wajid

CoordinatorPerson

Armenian Merchant Magnate

“Merchant magnate whose commercial network intersected with Plassey-era court politics.”

Khwaja Wajid was a powerful merchant in Bengal's trade networks whose commercial interests were linked to high-level political and economic maneuvering around Plassey.

Commercial power and court politics in mid-18th century Bengal.

His trajectory reflects how mercantile elites were embedded in sovereign power shifts and how trade, credit, and court politics interacted in eighteenth-century Bengal.

plassey-eratradearmenian-network
Details→

Khwaja Petruse

CoordinatorPerson

Armenian Court-Commercial Intermediary

“Armenian court-commercial intermediary associated with the Plassey period.”

Khwaja Petruse is mentioned in Bengal historical references as an Armenian intermediary in the court-commercial circles connected to the Plassey period.

Armenian intermediary networks in Nawabi Bengal.

His profile represents intermediary actors who linked commerce, diplomacy, and political change in mid-eighteenth-century Bengal.

plassey-eraintermediaryarmenian-network
Details→

Page 1 of 2

Next