Discover Bengal · Unfolded
❦Transparency International Bangladesh
Creator / Contributor
Explore all resources attributed to this name.
Resources
3
Anti-Corruption Drive and Governance Reform, 2007–2008
research-articles-and-papers · Scholarly Articles and Papers
Relevant source on the anti-corruption drive, governance reform, accountability claims, and the selective-justice debate.
Digital Security Act 2018 and the Draft Cyber Security Act 2023
primary-sources · Official Documents and Legal Texts
Civil-society analysis of the DSA’s use, criticism, and the later Cyber Security Act debate.
The Eleventh National Parliament Election 2018
research-articles-and-papers · Scholarly Articles and Papers
Structured research review of the election process, commission, administration, law enforcement, parties, and irregularity allegations.
Related Events
3
2007-2008
Emergency-era Caretaker Rule
After the 11 January 2007 emergency, Bangladesh entered a prolonged caretaker-governed period backed by security institutions. Anti-corruption drives, political detentions, and administrative restructuring took place under a non-elected framework before the December 2008 election restored elected government. The period remains one of the most contested transitions in contemporary Bangladeshi politics.
2,018
A Year of Protest, Control, and Contested Legitimacy
In 2018, Bangladesh saw a compressed sequence of youth-led protest, legislative tightening, and electoral confrontation. The Quota Reform Movement and Safe Road Movement showed how students could rapidly organize around fairness, accountability, and everyday governance. The Digital Security Act then sharpened anxiety over speech and state power, while the 11th Parliamentary Election at the end of the year deepened debate over participation, legitimacy, and the future of democratic competition.
2,018
Digital Security Act Enacted
The Digital Security Act was enacted in October 2018 and quickly became central to debate about freedom of expression in Bangladesh. Critics argued that its vague provisions, broad police powers, and speech-related penalties could be used to intimidate journalists, silence dissent, and extend state control over digital space.